Beyond North and South
"Direction" outside of geometry is slippery. In AI, direction stops being about points on a compass and starts being about which way to move in some space to make a thing better or worse. That space might be:
- Loss landscape — direction = which combination of weight changes makes the error drop fastest. The gradient is the steepest-descent direction.
- Embedding space — direction = the conceptual axis along which meaning varies.
king - man + woman ≈ queenuses the gender axis as a direction. - Attention space — direction = which previous token a new token is "looking at" most strongly.
None of these are physical. All of them obey the same vector rules. That's the bargain: once you can think in vectors, the bargain pays off in every weird AI space you ever meet.
Why Magnitude Alone Loses
If a model only knew "the loss is high," it could only say "things are bad." What it actually knows — via gradients — is "things are bad, AND if you wiggle w_42 a tiny bit upward and w_8 downward, things get less bad fastest." That's a direction. Without it, training would be random search. With it, training is steepest descent.
-작은 수일 때는 학습률이 너무 작아 기어감 (0.001 같이) -1일 때는 부호가 바뀌면서 값은 같으니 진동 -1이상일 떄는 발산시작 -0.1은 sweet spot이라고 할만함