Workshop, Debate, Red Team
Workshop is a critique circle. Everyone drafts independently, then each draft goes to a deterministic ring of K anonymous reviewers from the same participant pool. A reviewer may unknowingly critique its own brain's draft; that signal is recorded. Every author receives the critiques on its own draft and revises its own work. Nobody is eliminated, and the final bench scores the latest revisions.
Debate assigns positions rather than asking everyone to make the same artifact. Participants argue their assigned side, read opposing masked arguments, and answer through bounded rebuttal rounds. The bench rules which position won and what conclusion follows. Its product is the conclusion, not a prettiest-prose winner.
Red Team begins with candidate artifacts. Participants attack the other masked entries with concrete failures, tests, edge cases, or contradictions. Each author then gets one full defense-and-revision pass. The final bench scores the revised artifacts for how well they survived attack, while a separate attacker score records the strongest destructive analysis.
All three modes expose response to pressure, but the pressure source differs: peers improve every draft, assigned opposition sharpens a decision, and adversarial attack tests robustness.