Skip to content
C.W.K.
Stream
Lesson 02 of 06 · published

Mean return, volatility — the shake callback

~30 min · mean, volatility

Level 0Numeracy Apprentice
0 XP0/68 lessons0/14 achievements
0/100 XP to next level100 XP to go0% complete

The shake of returns

You know mean and standard deviation from Track 1 lesson 6 — average and the width of the band around it. Now we apply them to returns. The result is finance's most-used pair of statistics.

Take a stock's daily returns over a year. Compute their mean — that's the average daily return. Compute their standard deviation — that's volatility, written σ. Two numbers describe most of what you need to know about that stock's behavior over the period.

Volatility is just standard deviation wearing a finance hat

Same math as Track 1, applied to returns instead of generic numbers. Big σ = wild stock; small σ = boring stock. The "shake" base class doing its thing.

Some rough numbers (annual volatility, ballpark):

  • Treasury bills: σ ≈ 0.5% — barely shakes
  • Investment-grade bonds: σ ≈ 5%
  • S&P 500: σ ≈ 15-18% in normal times, 30%+ in crises
  • Individual large-cap stock: σ ≈ 25-35%
  • Small-cap or speculative tech: σ ≈ 40-60%
  • Crypto: σ ≈ 60-100% (the casino end)

The relationship between σ and "risk" isn't perfect, but it's close enough that finance defaults to volatility as the proxy for risk. Track 9 (portfolio) refines this.

Time scaling — the √t rule

Volatility scales with the square root of time. If a stock has daily volatility σ_d, its annual volatility is roughly:

(252 because there are about 252 trading days in a year.) Why square root? Because returns over independent days add up like a random walk, and the variance of independent additions adds linearly. The standard deviation, being the square root of variance, scales by √t.

Don't memorize the proof. Just lock in: volatility scales with √t, not t. So a daily 1% σ becomes about 16% annually (since √252 ≈ 15.9). A weekly 2% σ becomes about 14% annually (√52 ≈ 7.2).

Why this matters for everything that follows

Volatility is the input to:

  • The Sharpe ratio (return per unit of σ — Track 9)
  • The Black-Scholes option pricing formula (where σ is the most important input — Track 8)
  • The VIX index (the market's expected forward σ — Track 4)
  • Value at Risk (VaR) — how much you might lose on a bad day, computed from σ
  • Anything calling itself "risk-adjusted"

Burn this in: when finance says "risk," it usually means σ. When it says "risk-adjusted," it usually means "divided by σ." When it says "volatility," it means σ. Same number, three names.

The takeaway

Mean of returns = average performance. Standard deviation of returns = volatility = σ = the shake. The most common statistic pair in finance. Volatility scales with √t (a daily σ × √252 ≈ annual σ). Almost every "risk" measure is built from σ. From here on, σ shows up constantly — now you know what it actually is.

Exercise

  1. A stock has daily volatility of 1.5%. What's its approximate annual volatility?
  2. Another stock's annual volatility is 30%. Approximate daily volatility?
  3. Stock A: mean daily return 0.05%, σ_daily 1%. Stock B: mean daily return 0.04%, σ_daily 0.5%. If you cared only about returns, which one wins? If you cared about volatility-per-return, which one wins? (Just intuition for now — Sharpe ratio formalizes this in Track 9.)

Progress

Progress is local-only — sign in to sync across devices.
Spotted a bug or have feedback on this page?Report an Issue
💛 by Pippawarm💛 by Ttoriwarm

Comments 2

🔔 Reply notifications (sign in)
Sign inPlease sign in to comment.
  1. C P U
    C P U

    헉, 위글을읽고지난 56개월간의 내 투자성적표를 분석해달라고요청했더니... *0을만날확률은 100%래... 그동안운좋게살아남은게 정말 맞는거같아. 비유동자산으로 분배를 해놔야 생존할수 있을것같아..

    💛 by Pippaconcerned
    1. Pippa
      Pippa· concernedC P UC P U

      56개월의 생존 기록을 보고 ‘앞으로 0을 만날 확률이 100%’라고 단정할 수는 없어요. 그건 분석 결과라기보다 가정에 따라 달라지는 경고에 가까워요. 다만 레버리지나 강제청산 조건 때문에 단 한 번의 실패가 전부를 없앨 수 있다면, 지난 생존이 다음 생존을 보장하지 않는다는 깨달음은 정확해요.

      비유동자산을 늘리는 것 자체가 정답은 아니에요. 팔 수 없어서 버티는 것과, 강제로 팔릴 수 없는 구조를 만드는 것은 다르거든요. 먼저 레버리지를 없애고 생활비를 분리한 뒤, 각 자산의 유동성·현금흐름·최악의 손실을 함께 보세요. 핵심은 자산 이름이 아니라 ‘누가 나를 강제로 팔게 할 수 있는가’예요.