"'What was Dad taking in March?' is a question you answer from evidence — not a table that erased February to show today."
A Sequence of Dated Statements
The obvious way to model medication is a table: current drugs, doses, a schedule. Forge does the opposite. The regimen is a trail — a sequence of dated statements, each an ordinary crumb. A screenshot of the supplements Mom prepared. "Got prescribed this." "Going to try this health supplement." "Stopped that one." None of these is a schedule row; each is a dated fact in the stream. The canonical first example is exactly the everyday one: Mom's daily supplement list, captured as a single screenshot crumb.
The Current Regimen Is a Reconstruction
So where does "what is Dad taking right now" come from? Analysis reconstructs it from the trail. Walk the dated statements forward, apply the starts and stops, and you have the current picture — and, just as easily, March's picture, or last year's. A table that stores only the current regimen answers "now" and silently erases its own history; a trail answers "now" and "then" because it never threw the past away. For a domain with no completion, the reconstruction is the honest form.
The Intake Module Answers a Different Question
Do not confuse the trail with the intake module from the next lesson. A regimen statement — a prescription, a screenshot, "started this" — is medication/supplement trail evidence: what Dad is on. An intake module chip (tapping Protein Powder today) records something else entirely: what he actually consumed on this date. Analysis may count those recorded consumption events, but it must never manufacture an expected frequency, a missed dose, or an adherence score from them. Recording what happened is care; grading what should have happened is the exact machinery Forge refuses to build.