"The p-value is one of the most misread numbers in modern life. Naming what it is not is half the lesson."
The Definition
The p-value is: under the null hypothesis and the test's assumptions, the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as incompatible with H₀ as the observed one. What counts as “at least as extreme” depends on the statistic and whether the test is one- or two-sided. Informally:
p-value = P(test statistic this extreme or more | H₀ and model assumptions)
A small p-value means the observed data would be unlikely if the null were true. A small p-value gives you reason to reject the null. It does NOT, by itself, tell you the probability that the null is true, the probability that the alternative is true, the size of the effect, the practical importance of the effect, or whether the result will replicate.
The Misread Citizens Make
The most common misreading: 'p = 0.03 means there's a 3% chance the null hypothesis is true.' Wrong. That sentence reverses the conditional. The p-value is P(data | null), not P(null | data). Inverting the two is, once again, the prosecutor's fallacy.
To go from P(data | null) to P(null | data), you need Bayes' rule and a prior — exactly the move Track 08 will make. The frequentist p-value alone cannot give you that posterior. Most published 'statistically significant' findings are silently treated as if they did, and that silent slip is one of the major engines of the replication crisis in modern science.
What 'Statistical Significance' Really Buys You
'Significant at α = 0.05' means the pre-specified decision rule rejected H₀ because the p-value was at or below 0.05. Under the procedure's assumptions, the rule is designed to limit its long-run Type I error rate to 5%. It does NOT mean the effect is real, large, important, or reproducible.