"The pen includes the right to disagree, never the right to erase the disagreement."
Separate the powers
Feedback is evidence, not a command. The authoring brain may accept a note, revise in another direction, or keep the wording. The last choice is legitimate only when the ledger records why.
Let state name the role
For every note, store a disposition: accepted, repaired, or stetted. A stet carries a reason tied to the note and current text. This prevents disagreement from becoming disappearance.
The convenient overreach
Automatically applying every suggestion makes the reviewer the hidden author. Silently ignoring notes makes review theater. A disposition ledger preserves both authority and accountability.
Follow one sentence through four acts
Test “The Author May Stet” by tracing original authorship, translation authorship, blind review, and author revision. For each act list inputs, outputs, visible evidence, writable fields, and the proof handed forward. One brain may perform two roles at different times; the job and authority must still remain distinct.
Make the judgment
Take three review notes and record one accept, one repair, and one justified stet. If you cannot answer who chose the final wording in one sentence, provenance is too thin. A note that silently edits text or a stet whose reason disappears changes who holds the pen.
Narrow roles sharpen quality
Giving a reviewer every truth is not always an improvement. Restricting evidence and action makes the naturalness question answerable. The author uses that answer as material while retaining responsibility for the final choice.