Three primary lenses, not a taxonomy
The rest of this quest uses three primary lenses to look at the modern LLM landscape. They are not mutually exclusive categories — DeepSeek-R1 is MoE and reasoning-oriented at the same time. They are independent dimensions, like RGB color channels.
Lens 1 — Dense
Every token activates every parameter. The well-understood baseline. Llama, Gemma, Qwen dense, Mistral, Phi-4. Simple to fine-tune, simple to serve, simple to debug, well-supported by every inference engine on earth. Caps out somewhere around 100–400B before the FLOP cost per token gets nasty.
Lens 2 — Mixture of Experts
Many small expert FFNs per layer, only a few fire per token. Mixtral, DeepSeek-V2/V3/R1, Llama 4, Qwen3 MoE, Gemma 4 MoE, Mistral Large 3. Higher quality ceiling at the cost of more memory and serving complexity. The way frontier scale gets affordable.
Lens 3 — Reasoning-oriented
Spends extra inference compute to think before answering. o-series, Claude extended thinking, Gemini thinking modes, DeepSeek-R1, Qwen3 thinking mode. Almost always built on top of a dense or MoE backbone — the reasoning is in the post-training and inference axes, not the wiring.
How they combine
| Combination | Example | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| Dense + standard | Llama 3.3 70B | Predictable, fast, cheap, the conversational baseline. |
| Dense + reasoning | Qwen3 32B (thinking on) | Same checkpoint, higher latency, much better on hard tasks. |
| MoE + standard | DeepSeek-V3 | Frontier-scale knowledge at near-30B inference cost. |
| MoE + reasoning | DeepSeek-R1 | The current frontier paradigm. Capacity + careful thinking. |