Numerator–denominator play, the corporate finance edition
Lesson 1-3 said finance is numerator–denominator play. The balance sheet and income statement give us the raw materials. Now we combine them into ratios — small fractions that tell us specific things about a company's quality.
The most-used ratios fall into three groups: profitability, leverage, and liquidity. Each one is a fraction with a specific meaning.
Profitability ratios — how efficiently is the company turning resources into profit?
Return on Equity (ROE) = Net income / Shareholders' equity
How much profit per dollar of shareholder capital. Higher = more efficient use of equity. The Holy Grail of profitability metrics. Long-term healthy ROEs in the developed world are 12-20%; world-class compounders sometimes sustain 25-35%.
Return on Assets (ROA) = Net income / Total assets
How much profit per dollar of assets. ROA < ROE because assets include debt-financed parts. ROA tells you about asset productivity regardless of capital structure.
Net margin = Net income / Revenue (from lesson 5-2). How much of each revenue dollar becomes profit.
Leverage ratios — how much debt is the company using?
Debt-to-Equity = Total debt / Equity. From last lesson. High = more leveraged. Banks and utilities run high; tech companies often run low.
Interest coverage = EBIT / Interest expense. How many times can the company's operating earnings cover its interest payments? >5 is comfortable; <2 is danger zone.
Liquidity ratios — can the company pay near-term bills?
Current ratio = Current assets / Current liabilities. From last lesson. <1 = potential trouble.
Quick ratio = (Current assets − Inventory) / Current liabilities. Stricter (excludes inventory, which can be slow to convert to cash).
The DuPont decomposition — ROE seen as three levers
One famous decomposition shows that ROE breaks into three pieces:
Reading: Net margin × Asset turnover × Leverage ratio. Three independent ways a company can boost ROE — be more profitable per sale (margin), turn assets over faster (efficiency), or use more leverage. They have very different sustainability profiles.
A high-ROE company driven by leverage is fragile. A high-ROE company driven by margins and turnover is strong. Same headline number, very different stories. This is why ratios alone aren't enough — you have to read what's behind them.
The takeaway
Ratios = small fractions that summarize one aspect of the company. Profitability (ROE/ROA/margin), leverage (D/E, interest coverage), liquidity (current/quick ratio). All numerator–denominator play. The DuPont decomposition shows ROE has three drivers — margin, turnover, leverage — and the same ROE built differently means very different things. Ratios are pointers; the underlying drivers are the story.
표면적인 ROE 숫자는 같을 수 있다. 마진, 효율(회전율), 레버리지를 쪼개어 분석해야 한다. (실력으로 버는 기업) 빚을 지지 않고도 높은 순이익률이라는 상품의 경쟁력만으로 성과를 증명한다. 불황이 찾아와도 부채 상환 압박이 없어 장기 보유 관점에서 가장 안전하다. (효율적인 운영으로 버는 기업) 레버리지를 일정 수준 활용하여 보유한 자산을 신속하고 효율적으로 회전시키며 실력을 보여준다. (부채 효과로 뻥튀기한 기업) 마진과 회전율 등 자체적인 사업 경쟁력은 낮으면서 과도한 빚을 동원해 착시 효과를 만들었다. 매출이 조금만 감소해도 고정 부채 비용을 감당하지 못하고 도산할 위험이 크다.